1 – Chances are you have already made up your mind before you read this. You may bleat … that’s OT … or … we are saved by grace … and other misquoted escape verses.. God’s laws on marriage, divorce, remarriage while your spouse lives, and genetics will not be mocked. See https://www.larryhannigan.com.au/churches/01-why-did-god-create-marriage-for-one-man-and-one-woman-for-life/ … it’s pretty sobering. Category – Churches – Item 01
Firstly, this is not what some call Racism – each race exists for a purpose, but the origin of the races is another subject. Having a friend or “partner” of a different race is fine. The issue is copulating and/or producing children with them – ie the offspring. Matt 15.13 But he (Yeshua) answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. many more here
https://www.openbible.info/topics/race_mixing
——————————————————————————————
Author : Herrell John Year : 2007
The Sixth Commandment. In Exodus 20:13 (LXX), we find the sixth commandment1, a commandment we find repeated in the New Testament in Romans 13:9 and elsewhere (cf. Matthew 5:27, Luke 18:20, Mark 10:19, Jacob (James) 2:11, et al.). So we immediately notice that this commandment is explicitly stated in both the Old and New Testaments. The reason is that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever (Heb. 13:8). With God, there is no variance or shadow of turning (Jacob 1:17).
Obviously, this sixth commandment is very important. In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelise.”
In many people’s minds, there is a great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore.
However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley.
Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and mankind or of different races.” This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation You will not mongrelize, mix races, is correct.
So now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. …
When you are watching TeLIEvision tonight, observe how much RACE-MIXING is encouraged Young people watching are being “brainwashed” into thinking that it’s ok to mix the races. IT IS NOT.
2 – Women Store DNA From Every Man They’ve Ever Made Love With. Women “harvest” every male’s DNA.
by Daisy Magnum May 3, 2018 May 31, 2018
Study: Women Store DNA From Every Man They’ve Ever Made Love With
Women retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have sexual intercourse. This bombshell discovery has been unearthed during a brand-new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center..
The scientific study actually discovered the shocking information by accident.
Scientists were initially attempting to identify whether women who were pregnant with a son are more susceptible to specific neurological illnesses that take place more regularly in males. But as the scientists picked apart the female brain, the research study began to drift hugely off course.
Women harvest DNA
What they actually found, however, is that the female brain is far more complex than we previously believed. The research study found that female brains typically harvest “male microchimerism.” Or, to put it simply; they found the existence of male DNA that stemmed from other individuals. These cells are genetically different from those that make up the “host” female.
According to the research, the study reports:
“63% of the females (37 of 59) tested harbored male microchimerism in the brain. And “Male microchimerism was present in multiple brain regions.”
So 63% of women carry male DNA cells that live in their brains.
Clearly, the scientists wanted to know where the male DNA originated from.
Perhaps you would naturally assume it was inherited from the woman’s father?
No. Your father’s DNA integrates with your mother’s to create your special DNA.
So where else could it come from?
Through the study, the researchers presumed that the most likely answer was that male DNA found living in the female brain came from a male pregnancy. That was the safe, politically correct assumption. However, these researchers were living in denial.
Since, when they conducted an autopsy of the brains of women who had actually never, ever even been pregnant, not to mention never had a son, they STILL discovered male DNA cells in the female brain.
At this point, the scientists were baffled.
Despite their confusion, they did their best to cover-up the proof up until they could understand and discuss it.
They buried it in various sub-studies and posts, but if you sort through them all you will find the damning declaration.
There’s one line that gives the game away and describes precisely where these male DNA cells originate from. What are they so afraid of?
“CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not irregular in females without sons.
“Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, disappeared male twin, an older sibling transferred by the maternal blood circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE.
“Male microchimerism was substantially more frequent and levels were greater in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories.
“More research studies are needed to figure out specific origins of male microchimerism in women.”
So according to the scientists, the possible sources of the male DNA cells residing in the women’s brains are:
–an abortion the female was unaware of
–a male twin that disappeared
–an older sibling transferred by the maternal flow
–sexual intercourse
Thinking about the reality that 63% of women have male DNA cells living in the recesses of their brain, which of the above possibilities do you think is the most likely origin of the male DNA?
The first three possibilities apply to only a very small portion of women.
They could not possibly explain the high figure of 63%.
The fourth choice? It’s rather more typical. The answer is 4. Sex.
This has crucial ramifications for females. DNA stays with women for life.
Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you for life. The women autopsied in this research study were elderly. Some had been carrying the living male DNA inside them for well over 50 years.
Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you, it swims and swims until it crashes headlong into a wall, and then it attaches and burrows into your flesh.
If it’s in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes.
Then it digs in. It enters your bloodstream and collects in your brain and spine. Like something out of a sci-fi movie, it becomes a part of you and you cannot eliminate it. We are only now beginning to understand the full power and implications of sexual intercourse.
.
7
7